|
It seems either that literature too strongly
influences my ideas about life, or that I am able
to make no connection at all between its wisdom
and my
existence.
--Philip Roth,
My Life As A Man
Ulm is a pleasantly provincial,
mildly dull German town on the Danube. It’s the
kind of place where people always say you’re only
two hours from the Alps, or Switzerland, or
Austria, or France. So you start to live your
life in anticipated two-hour chunks of commuter
time, two-hour escapes from pleasant provinciality
and mild boredom, knowing full well that if you
lived in Salzburg, or Zürich, or Strasbourg, no
one would ever remind you that you’re only two
hours from Ulm, Germany.
But you don’t live in
Salzburg, or Zürich, or Strasbourg. You live on
the top floor of a condominium complex on the
former Adolf Hitler Strasse in Ulm, seven thousand
miles from the golden shores of California and San
Francisco, the city you swore you’d never leave.
Outside the kitchen
window there’s a half moon the color of bleached
bone rising out of the worn, gray clouds of a
winter sky. A German winter sky, cold, low-horizoned,
the searchlight sweep of street lights exposing
wind-blown tree branches glazed in snow, iced-over
cobblestone streets reflecting light like
mirrors.
The Münster bell
rings out midnight and the spotlights illuminating
the cathedral blink off, five- hundred-year-old
consecrated stones and the carved cries of
time-frozen gargoyles sinking back into darkness.
In a few hours the rising sun will blanch the sky
the color of sea-worn seashells, blank and
featureless.
How the hell did I
wind up here?
I’m not quite sure. There must be
some totalizing overview, some neat cover story to
explain this course. Destiny, perhaps? In his
Letters To A Young Poet, Rainer Maria Rilke
writes, “that which we call destiny goes forth
from within people, not from without into them.”
If Rilke is right, then I projected this destiny
from within myself out into the world-at-large. I
honestly don’t remember doing this. My projected
destiny was a crumbling stone rustico among
the vineyards and stars of the Italian
countryside.
Perhaps there is a point high
enough, even higher than the observation nest
cradled at the top of the Münster’s spire, to be
able to see the spider-thread connections between
events, to focus the anarchy of my experiences
into a clear, controlled picture of WHY. If I can
locate this place, will I find the answer or will
the sum of the parts still only add up to the
parts themselves? That is the question I want
answered.
Perhaps narrative itself is the
privileged space where meaning solidifies and the
answers magically appear. Some believe time
burnishes memory, others that time erases it.
Perhaps it’s a little of both—-or neither.
Perhaps time creates memory, singular and
unique, in the minds of each and every one of us.
These are my memories.
By the way, did I mention that I’m
Jewish?
There’s an old Jewish joke about a
man in the Berlin ghetto after the Nazis have come
to power. He’s walking down the street one day,
reading Der Sturmer, the Nazi propaganda
newspaper. Another man walks up to him and says
“what are you, crazy? Why are you reading that?”
And the first man replies, “well, according to
this we’re all millionaires who secretly control
the world...”
As a member of the
International Jewish conspiracy, I help control
the American government, the media, the state of
Israel and (in my off-hours) the banking industry.
All kidding aside, I’ve never really felt Jewish.
Even when I lived in Idaho for three years, among
Mormons, political extremists, Christian Identity
fanatics, neo-Nazis and militia members who
believe in the existence of the ZOG, the Zionist
Occupation Government that secretly runs America,
I still felt American. Even when a few of
those fanatics actually burned a cross on the only
rabbi in town’s front lawn.
One of the reasons I left for Europe in 1998 was I
no longer wanted to feel American. I wanted to
feel off-balance, foreign, like my life had a more
demanding purpose than deciding which mall to shop
at. Even though I spent my time wandering around
San Francisco, from Union Square to North Beach,
down California Street and through Chinatown to
Market Street, from the Mission to the Haight, it
was still a life focused on material consumption.
Coffee at Starbucks or Peet’s? Lunch at the Pork
Store Café or Mario’s Bohemian Cigar Shop? Dinner
at the Pasta Pomodoro in the Richmond or North
Beach, where the waitresses were cuter? What
about that leather jacket marked down from $1200
to only $399.95?
Pick up the new James Ellroy novel at Borders on
Powell Street (30% off!) or support independent,
full-priced City Lights? Grocery shopping at
Whole Foods market, in order to maintain that
low-fat, low-cholesterol, healthy glow? How about
a new pair of $100 running shoes for those 8 mile
jogs through Golden Gate Park, down to the
breakers and back? All the daily choices of
conspicuous consumption taking over and defining
the routines of our lives.
At this time, I was high on
self-transformation--which, ironically, is the
most American of dreams and desires. I no longer
wanted to be an English professor, deconstructing
the great works of narrative art into chunks of
lifeless, jargon-filled discourse. The way I
experienced literature was completely disconnected
from life; I couldn’t believe the writers I loved
had written these books just so a bunch of
academic bounty hunters could pursue their
“meaning” from the padded, comfortable chairs of
the tenured life.
I wanted to become a novelist. I wanted to write;
not the baby formula of academic prose, but about
the risk-filled, real-life experiences of the
romantic artist.
That semester I taught Henry Miller’s Tropic of
Cancer to my senior literature students at
Claremont McKenna College, and I knew, in
ways I had never known anything in my life, that I
had to quit, I had to leave my life behind.
Miller showed me that in many ways to leave
America is the most American thing an American can
do. I didn’t know how to do this, but I did know
that a life of tenured security does not produce
art. Look at what happened to John Irving.
There was a difference between the
people who wrote books and the people who wrote
books about books. Miller captured the essence of
what separates a writer from an academic (or a
writer in academia) in Sexus:
You need bigger
problems, bigger difficulties.
You don’t function well until you’re hard pressed.
I don’t know what you’re doing but I’m certain
that your present life is not suited to you. You
were meant to lead a dangerous life; you can take
greater risks than
others...
If there is any less dangerous of a life than the
protected, intellectual game preserve of a
university campus, I’d be hard pressed to come up
with one. As Byron once chided the critic
Francis Palgrave:
Did he never spill a dish of tea over his
testicles in handing the cup to his charmer to the
great shame of his nankeen breeches?—-did he never
swim in the sea at Noonday with the Sun in his
eyes and on his head—-which all the foam of ocean
could not cool? did he never draw his foot out of
a tub of too hot water damning his eyes & his
valet's? did he never inject for a Gonorrhea?—-or
make water through an ulcerated Urethra?—was he
ever in a Turkish bath-—that marble paradise of
sherbet and sodomy?—-was he ever in a cauldron of
boiling oil like St. John?
Sexually transmitted diseases, Turkish baths
and cauldrons of boiling oil aside, I found myself
craving real, hardscrabble experience.
I graduated from the University of
Arizona in 1992, with a Ph.D. in English, one of
only two members of my entering class to do so.
The other, Sue Gomberg, a driven, red-haired woman
in her thirties, was the only member of my
entering class to leave with a job as well. Two
weeks later she and her fiancé were killed in a
car accident in Rhode Island. This did not bode
well for my own sense of future accomplishment in
the arena of academia. What I’ve since come to
call the Malicious Gods had issued a warning, but
a warning that I chose to ignore.
I had to wait nearly two years before landing
my first job in academe, a “visiting” assistant
professorship at Idaho State University in
Pocatello. I would be visiting because there
would be absolutely no way I would be considered
for a tenured position at the school. In the
bizarre, byzantine employment structure of
universities in America, a tenure-track position
is the Holy Grail, one held out as a bright,
shimmering possibility to all newly minted Ph.D’s.
In reality, most of us wind up working as
temporary laborers, at salaries often half or even
a third of those of our tenured “colleagues,”
shackled to the good liberal’s version of the
Indian caste system.
I had already had my doubts about
the value of becoming an academic. When I left
for Arizona in 1985 in a 14 foot moving van
containing my middle-class life, I thought that
university professors should be offered the same
reverence that people in Calcutta reserve for
those cows standing lazily on dusty streets. When
I left Arizona six long years later, alone, except
for a few boxes of books stuffed in my car, I
thought most university professors should be lined
up against a wall and shot. I was more than
willing to pull the trigger.
At Arizona I had been
surrounded by novelists as well as professors: Ed
Abbey, Scott Momaday, Richard Ford, Terry
McMillan, Robert Bosworth, Antonya Nelson,
Francine Prose and yes, David Foster Wallace, who
spent one year in the MFA program while getting
his first novel published (thanks, largely, to
Robert Bosworth). Wallace’s parting gesture was
to produce a parody of the English department
newsletter—-and blame it on me. A real mensch.
At the time, though, I was a
disciple of deconstruction, a fugitive from the
fictional muse. I actually enjoyed reading
Derrida and Foucault, Deleuze and Guattari,
Baudrillard and Barthes. Give me a Gordian knot
of discourse like this one from Deleuze and
Guattari’s What Is Philosophy and I was
happy:
Yet one more step: when immanence becomes immanent
“to” a transcendental subjectivity, it is at the
heart of its own field that the hallmark or figure
[chiffre] of a transcendence must appear as
action now referring to another self, to another
consciousness (communication).
Those were the heady days of
theoretical discourse, when secondary sources
displaced primary sources as primary sources in
literary studies. For example, I had a course in
the novels of William Faulkner in which we never
got around to reading any of the novels of William
Faulkner, but spent weeks discussing Julia
Kristeva’s theory of abjection or Jacques
Derrida’s Of Grammatology. There was no
need to get to know the novelists in the
department, or even to think about writing novels,
because the Future Belonged To Theory.
But not to me. Even though I was good at
this stuff, I had pretty much alienated everyone
in the English department with my antics,
mini-rebellions against the entrenched, solidified
power structures of fossilized academia. I spent
six days a week in the weight room, working out
with the athletes most academics so despise, seven
days a week by the pool, working on my tan,
and every night of the week at bars, sleeping with
as many of my students as I could. I had spent my
twenties actually working for a living, fifty,
sixty hours a week in drudgery and boredom,
shackled to spouse and family, so taking a couple
of classes and teaching another class or two each
semester was easy. And I managed to get A’s on
every paper and in every class. Oh yes, I was
un très mauvais suject. No wonder everyone
hated me.
The summer after I finally graduated I
received a National Endowment for the Humanities
fellowship at the University of Washington, to
spend the summer studying German philosophy and
deconstruction. Four thousand tax-free dollars to
spend in the coffee-and-grunge capital of America,
courtesy of Lynn Cheney.
A summer sublet on Capital Hill, my own office, an
obligation to attend two three-hour seminars per
week, as well as a moral obligation to spend as
much of the rest of the time off-campus and in the
bars and clubs of Seattle as possible—-bands like
Nirvana and Soundgarden were still playing in
clubs like Rock Candy at this time, and Prince’s
“Sexy Muthafucka” was the late-night disco theme
du jour--no wonder the life of an academic
appealed so much to me. What I didn’t understand
at the time, or what I understood but more likely
wanted to ignore, was the incredible sense of
complacency this kind of caged atmosphere breeds
in human beings.
But three short
months later, Arcadia on Lake Washington was past
and I arrived in Pocatello, Idaho, to begin my
teaching career.
I find it astonishing that most left-leaning
professors, while championing the rights of
oppressed groups such as single mothers,
Palestinians, Africans, child laborers and
Asian sex slaves, will condone the use of
graduate students and adjuncts as slave labor
in their own institutions. While the average
university professor earns over $50,000 a year
for teaching just three classes a semester,
the average grad student or adjunct earns
between $10-26,000 per year, teaching four to
six classes a semester, without benefits or
health insurance. There is a caste/class
system on every campus in America, one that
good feminists and liberals would protest
against mightily in the real world, but remain
strangely silent about in their world, because
the academic system of privilege and power
would collapse if they had to treat their
“untouchables” with the equality they so much
want to extend to other trendy groups of the
oppressed. As Ron Rosenbaum has written,
“the deluded and pathetic sophistry of
postmodernists of the Left, who believe their
unreadable, jargon-clotted theory-sophistry
somehow helps liberate the wretched of the
earth. If they really believe in serving the
cause of liberation, why don’t they quit their
evil-capitalist-subsidized jobs and go teach
literacy in a Third World starved for the
insights of Foucault?”
|