<% function mstrGetRelativeURL() mstrGetRelativeURL=Request.serverVariables("PATH_INFO") End function %> <%Dim CurrentURL CurrentURL = mstrGetRelativeURL %>
Issue 7 - Generation B

Wednesday January 15, 2003

How do you solve a problem like Korea?
By Tad Hayworth

Another year passes and North Korea gives the world more of the same saber-rattling. The thugs in Pyongyang are ringing in the new year by accusing the United States of plotting war. The rest of the world chuckles grimly, considering that the North Koreans have a half million men or more within 20 miles of the border with South Korea, while the South has a third that many. The South also hosts 37,000 US military personnel, who have the dubious honor of being there solely to die valiantly and force the US to war if the North invades.

North Korea is one of the last Stalinist dictatorships in the world, and its leaders would have hanged long ago if it didn't have unrest with the South to keep the military fed and busy. The more desperate their internal situation, the louder they beat the drums of war. Like the sheriff in Blazing Saddles, they keep getting out of tight spots by holding a gun to their own head. And for 30 years it has worked. South Koreans hope that by occasionally throwing a few bucks their way, the North will postpone the invasion and eventually the regime will collapse under its own
incompetence.

How much of a threat is North Korea? There can be little doubt that they have the ability to kill large numbers of people in the South, but it is fairly unlikely that they would succeed in holding onto the whole peninsula, even without US intervention. Of course, with substantial military aid from China they would fare better. Unfortunately for the North Koreans, China views them as the weird little brother who they have to keep bailing out of jail. With a rapidly growing economy and desire for a huge empire, China realizes that a Korea united under Pyongyang's thumb will be a big mouth to feed, while a strong South Korea provides markets and products. If it weren't such a constant drain on their chief rival (the US) North Korea wouldn't be much use to China at all.

Clausewitz recognized that all other factors being equal, defense is the stronger form of war. The terrain on the Korean peninsula favors the defenders. Both sides have turned the areas near the DMZ into deathtraps for opposing forces, with enormous numbers of mines, pre-sited artillery targets, and fire sacks. To make matters worse for the invader, in the 1980s Western military doctrine and technology became geared towards fighting while outnumbered, maintaining mobility, counterattacking where possible, and striking enemy follow-on forces with precision weapons to slow the advance. These tactics have proven effective both in training and in combat. The North Koreans may well find themselves deep in South Korea with no supplies, no air cover, no remaining navy, and no way to get back.

A second Korean war would be a bloodbath for both sides, but it is likely that the North's government would fall when the invasion failed. The big question is whether the government in Pyongyang is rational at all. If the North is playing a calculated game to draw money and aid from the South, then war is not very likely. We all have to hope that they haven't been in power so long and in such isolation that they have started to believe their own propaganda. If they have, they might just pull that trigger.


 

Send this to a friend

Your email: email to send

Home | Interact | About | Feedback | Site Map

© Copyright <%=year(now)%> All rights reserved. ZCPortal.com
 
   
Advertising policy